<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns="http://my.netscape.com/rdf/simple/0.9/">

<!-- MHonArc v2.6.16 -->

  <channel>
    <title>IETF Discussion
</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf</link>
    <description>Email archive for IETF Discussion
.</description>
  </channel>
 
  <item>
    <title>Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-behave-dccp (Network Address Translation	(NAT) Behavioral Requirements for DCCP) to Proposed Standard</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34239.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34238.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: Call for Comments: Principles of Internet Host Configuration</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34237.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34236.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34235.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34234.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34233.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>RFC 2141 - URN Syntax</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34232.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-bryant-mpls-tp-jwt-report-00</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34231.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: [dnsext] Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsext-forgery-resilience	(Measures for making DNS more resilient against forged answers)	to Proposed Standard</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34230.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: RFC 2026 interpretation question</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34229.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: RFC 2026 interpretation question</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34228.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: RFC 2026 interpretation question</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34227.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: Fw: Proposal for .gb (great britain) suffix &amp; alteration of the	kalphabet in .uk</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34226.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>The IETF policy needs to be expanded for two types of IPR	Declarations.</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34225.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: RFC 2026 interpretation question</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34224.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34223.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34222.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-avt-dtls-srtp - DTLS-SRTP to Proposed	Standard</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34221.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34220.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34219.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34218.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34217.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34216.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34215.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34214.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Last Call: draft-ietf-avt-dtls-srtp - DTLS-SRTP to Proposed Standard</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34213.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34212.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34211.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34210.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34209.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34208.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34207.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: RFC 2026 interpretation question</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34206.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34205.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34204.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34203.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: RFC 2026 interpretation question</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34202.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: RFC 2026 interpretation question</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34201.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: RFC 2026 interpretation question</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/ietf/msg34200.html</link>
  </item>

 

</rdf:RDF>
 
<!-- MHonArc v2.6.16 -->
